May 20th, 2012

Failed Oil Additives of the Past

Oil Additives Failure in the Past.

Therefore Poor Gas Savings for Consumers

…and Skepticism (‘til now?)

Why have oil additives failed to live up to expectations in bringing real gas economies? (See what is radically wrong in this picture below.)


The long-standing approach of "anti-friction" oil additives is that the additive is designed to reduce friction and therefore heat buildup inside the engine.  If this does occur, gas mileage should increase over time and engine wear should decrease substantially.


The problem with oil additives to this point  in the automotive industry, has been the fact that different substances (molybdenum, chlorinated paraffins, PTFE, zinc compounds... and others) have been carried by the oil...


This is pitted and metal is missing.
“Moly” was used in this motor oil.
No apparent protection at this stage engine life.
Click Image for Larger View!
 

….but they DO NOT permanently adhere to the internal metal stress points of the engine.  So, instead of  "building up" a protective anti-friction surface over the metal parts, these components slide down into the oil pan when the oil cools, with the motor oil that carried them. They can later "sludge" ... or "fry" being destroyed by the heat buildup they were supposed to reduce.

Enginall brings a new technological revolution to the oil additives/oil fortifiers industry.



(See its industrial background and success).  The lifter below – tested side by side with the engine of the lifter above, under exactly the same conditions – is protected. The original machining lines are still visible in pictures of this very lifer.


EnginALL protection. Lifter
appears unscathed after 
same loads testing as above.
Click Image for Larger View

Go here for more answers.

EnginALL protection – You CAN get it here.